With the failure of the General Assembly and Governor to approve a map by the court deadline, it now falls to Nathaniel Persily to draw Pennsylvania’s next congressional map. This court-appointed special master is known for his skills as a mapmaker in other states. No matter how skilled, no one is perfect. How will we know if he gets it right in Pennsylvania?
On February 15, 2018, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court received 8 map submissions for congressional districts. Each purported to fully comply with the court order to be compact and contiguous, generally equal in population, and split local governments only when absolutely necessary for population equality. But did any comply with the court order?
While the proposed Pennsylvania congressional map is undeniably an improvement over the 2011 version, a deeper analysis shows some shortcomings and reveals several choices with far-reaching impacts.
The requirement to redraw Pennsylvania's congressional map offers a unique opportunity to gauge the temperature for redistricting reform. By February 9, citizens will witness the degree to which the State Legislature will embrace neutral redistricting principles outlined in the Constitution.
Most people would think a difference of 19 persons or even 125 persons is insignificant in a district of over 700,000 persons. But the...
6 years ago today, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court declared the State Senate and House districts were unconstitutional based on the evidence presented in my case. Just 2 days ago, this same court declared another legislative map unconstitutional -- the map configuring congressional districts.
Many people look at the maps of legislative districts and shake their heads in disbelief. The boundaries of numerous congressional, state senate, and state representative...
Common Cause will honor redistricting work at its 40th Anniversary Awards Dinner.
Mounting voter frustration has led to the exploration of some radically new redistricting methods.
Our final look at the Holt II decision brings us to a second puzzlement in the majority opinion.